The Offence of Theft under the 1968 Theft Act should have been straightforward. Unfortunately, the courts have interpreted it to become illogical and confusing. Discuss

A semi optimistic article was published adept previous to the theft trans sufficeion 1968 in the redbrick jurisprudence Review, regarding the overtake of the therefore law of thievery, identifying some of the grass-roots problems instigating the major rethink (1): ·making the law easier to understand ·Reducing complexity and incertitude ·To focus on self-possession rights and not possessory rights ·To overcome a myriad of inconsistencies under the then current law ·To swipe a large amount of rare and redundant statutory and common law offences ·Reduce the material body of offences done newborn concepts and redefinitions ·Expanding the ambit of some offences The Theft roleplay 1968 replaced the larceny Act 1916, to come into force on Jan 1 1969 as an embodiment of the recommendations of the CLRCs report on Theft and cogitate Offences (2). Commentaries of attainable interpretations by respected authors followed (3) as well as critical remarks reflecti ng the general morale of the critics regarding the overall performance of the new act: ·The Act is no masterpiece (4) ·The law (is) purged with chivalrous obfuscation.and (is) a depressing exercise (5) ·rather at haphazard development of important doctrines in the law of theft (6) prof smith expressed his excitement regarding new challenges (7), and also give vent his frustration through angry remarks at the illogical decisions such as Hinks (8). ------------------------------------- 1.         R. Stuart, law Reform and the Reform of the Law of theft, Modern Law Rev (1967) p609 2.         CMnd 2977; J.K. Macleod, Restitution under the Theft Act 1968, CLR (1968) p577 3.         J.M. Collins, The Theft Act and its Commentators CLR (1968) p638 4.         J.M. Collins, The Theft Act and its Commentators CLR (1968) p638 at 647 5.         D.W. Elliott, imposture under the Theft Act (1972) CLR p625 6.    Â Â Â Â Â Â L. Koffman, The Nature of Appro! priation, CLR (1982) p33 7.         J.C. Smith, Obtaining cheques... If you inadequacy to dismay a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay